See Who Supports Our Campaign
Cameron Smith
Read more
Michael Taylor
Read more
Mia McGrath
Read more
James Beckett
Read more
Timothy Paul
Read more
Christos Fellas
Read more
Anna Brading
Read more
Matthew Gay
Read more
Will Gryba
Read more
Cameron Smith
I support this campaign because it will empower young people with the knowledge and access to make informed financial decisions, build good habits like saving and investing early, and ultimately transform how a generation thinks about money - creating greater financial literacy and a stronger investing culture for the future.
Michael Taylor
It seems truly bizarre that at 16-years-old you can make the choice to join the army yet not be able to open a Cash or a Stocks & Shares ISA. Anyone able to make the decision to serve and face both the physical and mental risks that entails should be able to to decide what they do with their money and have the same options as anyone else who is a tax resident in the UK. I support this proposal because those who start work and save at 16 should not risk being punished for going over their Personal Savings Allowance. It's only fair to offer these individuals the same treatment as the rest of those who support our economy and pay taxes. Financial education should be a priority for the United Kingdom and those two extra years of potential investments can add up to large sums when compounded over time. By promoting both the merits and risks of sensible investing and saving we empower 16 and 17-year-old individuals to take charge of their money and be responsible for it.
Mia McGrath
Changing the investing age to 16 is something I feel incredibly passionate about. At 16, you can leave school and work a full-time job, open a bank account, have a NI number etc. With all these things in mind, why not be able to plan for your financial future. We all know that the sooner you invest, the better results you can reap from compound interest - not only that you are able to take more risk with financial planning due to the amount of time spent in the market. As a personal finance creator, I get many parents asking me what they can do for their child this age, only being able to recommend a junior ISA feels limited. Even though the knock on effects may not be significant, being able to have that option there with the correct guardrails could change many people's lives. If we collectively want more of the UK to be investing, this feels like a natural step forward.
James Beckett
Less than one in ten Brits have a Stocks and Shares ISA. If we want to build a thriving retail investing culture like the US, we need to empower the next generation to start earlier. The habits we form around money as teenagers can shape the rest of our lives, and this is a chance to help young people build one of the best habits they’ll ever have: investing for their future. Right now, there’s a lost group of 16 and 17-year-olds who could be investing, but can’t. If a parent hasn’t opened a Junior ISA before their child turns sixteen, it’s unlikely they ever will. Lowering the access age would give these young people a bridge to start learning, investing, and taking ownership of their financial journey. At 16 or 17, you can work, pay taxes and soon even vote, yet you still can’t invest your own money for the long term. That feels completely out of step with the world we live in today. The government has said it wants to build an investing culture in this country, but real change takes time. Allowing 16 and 17-year-olds to open ISAs won’t transform the public finances overnight, but it would plant the seeds for a generation that is more financially literate.
Timothy Paul
I want to support a culture where young people are encouraged and empowered to take action. Because the hardest step is the first one. So to be part of an initiative that gives 16 and 17-year-olds this opportunity earlier in life is a powerful statement of trust which I strongly believe in. From a practical point of view, there is very minimal downside in implementing this change. The only “cost" is the potential loss of tax revenue on interest, dividends, or capital gains for the government, but since most 16 and 17-year-olds have relatively small savings, this loss would be very small overall. And in the long run, encouraging the youth to start investing earlier will actually benefit the economy. It will introduce them to the idea of financial security, less reliance on credit, and better prepare them for adult life.
Christos Fellas
Allowing young people to invest earlier encourages responsible money management, teaching key concepts like compound interest, saving, and economics while habits are still forming. With the government proposing legislation to lower the voting age to 16, it makes sense to align the legal investing age too. If young people can vote on financial and economic policies, they should also be trusted to take their finances into their own hands. Combining early access to investing with proper financial education can protect young people from misinformation online and foster a generation of informed, long-term investors.
Anna Brading
I am a parent of 3 children whom I am teaching about the importance of saving and long-term investing. Although we already invest for our kids in a JISA, we want them to be able to start their own investing journey independently, as soon as they start earning. Even if it’s just a small amount from a part-time job, I think it’s important that 16 and 17-year-olds feel empowered to build the habit of long-term investing as soon as possible. Lowering the age for a Stocks and Shares ISA could help encourage the next generation of investors to get started.
Matthew Gay
Lowering the ISA age empowers young people to start building wealth and good money habits earlier, which is vital for adult life! With the right education, it teaches discipline, patience, and long-term thinking instead of chasing quick wins. Those ready to learn and take responsibility deserve the same chance as any adult to shape their financial future for the better. Let's start simple, allow young adults to make good financial decisions earlier.
Will Gryba
This topic touches me deeper, as at 16, I always wanted to try and make more money and make it work for me, but it seemed like there was nothing out there. I was naïve and fell for all the get-rich-quick schemes. Thus, if we can make real, true financial education accessible to 16-year-olds, we will not only create more interest around the subject, but compound interest will have even longer to kick in. Even though not every 16- year-old will listen, it’ll be on their radar, and the ones who take it upon themselves to learn about personal finance will be able to create a better life for themselves and this country’s economy.


.png?width=915&height=880&name=KV_LP_Majority%20of%20parents%20ISA_2025_884x850%20(1).png)